Question for developers

[emekat]

simply put, the reason behind not making every instrument sustain is backwards compatibility. there have already been plenty of amazing songs written without sustain (example below), and making all the instruments sustain would ruin them.

this song was finished in 2019 and is still one of the greatest pieces on OS today, even after all the updates we've been through. if every instrument sustained, it would sound like garbage

That can be worked around while preserving back-compatibility. Either add sustain control as an option (say with a button) or have a mirrored list of separate instruments.

[emekat]

Why don't you want to add sustain for all instruments? Is it that hard? Do it, please. No need for percussion

It will take too much storage and too long to load songs.  Many instruments can already be sustained or pseudo sustained using a few different techni

But this "pseudo-sustain" wouldn't work with a harpsichord, for example, would it?

I get the point, but this example is hilarious because harpsichords are known for their lack of sustain and dynamic control.

Not if I'm using true OS spirit and trying to make a clavinet by pitching a harpsi.

[DorisBay]

If there are programmers here, I would like to know your opinion on email migration https://www.emltopst.com/. I found a product with which I can transfer my data from one mail to Outlook mail. How safe is it?